Tags: Critics Of Turner'S Frontier ThesisGraduating High School EssayEasy Persuasive Essay PromptsLoan AssignmentMath Makes Sense Homework Book Grade 5Model Dissertation PaperResearch Paper Structure MlaEssay On My Favourite Sports CricketEssays On Why College Education Is Important
As a result of this the last little bit of hope was lost.Both the Zefferelli and the Luhrmann films, showed how bizarre ‘Romeo and Juliet’ really was.However the romance is brought into scene three, because of the fight between Romeo, Mercutio and Tybalt in Luhrmann’s version made it feel more important and noticeable.
This single reduction did in fact totally alter the conclusion of the story.
In Shakespeare's version, Romeo still could have been accepted into society before killing Paris (as Father Laurence pointed out), since he was exiled for killing Tybalt, Mercutio's murderer.
The props were then updated from the 1600s to their modern-day equivalent, guns, and the coastal area was re-named "Verona Beach".
Even though Zefferelli chose a more classical setting, he still changed some of the scenery.
Both of the films are a tragedy type film because of the deaths of close family and friends; there is fighting and despair, and two of the main characters die during scene three and two more die in the final scene, concluding the play.
Both of the films are romances, and the main theme of the film.
These were mainly minor changes in outdoor scenes that couldn't be exactly simulated on a stage.
Some of the scenes weren't even in the written text, such as Romeo and Balthasar galloping from Mantua, and others, such as the large peasant-filled Verona Square, could have been depicted more authentically.
In Both movies Romeo chased Tybalt and challenged him to a duel, but in the original, it was Tybalt who attacked Romeo.
Romeo was defending himself when he killed Tybalt, so he was in a good position in the eyes of the 16th century law system.