Tags: Knowledge Is Power Essay In UrduDu Bois EssaysFossil Fuels And Alternative Energy Sources EssayBest Closing Statement Cover LetterBuffer Overflow Research PaperExample Of A Literature Review For A DissertationRace In Othello Thesis
Take particular note of the parts of the paper that your expertise speaks best to.Editors do not expect you to be an expert in absolutely every aspect of the paper, although they also don’t want you to be a novice.
This tells the authors how you — the reader — have interpreted the aims, results and novelty of their research.
If they disagree with your analysis, they should, from your comments, be able to understand that this is not your fault.
Try to spot anywhere the paper might start to take you on a wild goose chase.
The paper should leave wild geese alone, unless it’s a submission to an ornithology journal.
You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS.
To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer).
The full peer-review document can comprise the following sections: 1. Reading it this way will also draw your attention to how your criticisms might sound to the ears of the authors. Naturalist 173, E155–E158; 2009): “review for others as you would have others review for you”. This is an article from the Nature Careers Community, a place for Nature readers to share their professional experiences and advice. You can get in touch with the editor at [email protected]
Introduction: Mirror the article, state your expertise and whether the paper is publishable, or whether there are fatal flaws; 2. Ensure that your critiques are constructive and not offensive. Sometimes, you should submit a harsh review, but never a rude one.
The science might be great, but heavy composition and messy structure might bog down the main message.
If you comment on the writing, make sure you back up your comments.